Review: Fury – Tanks, Testosterone, and… Tears?
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Fury is like the war movie equivalent of a heavy metal album loud, intense, and full of machismo, but somehow also emotionally deep if you squint hard enough. Directed by David Ayer, this 2014 film about a U.S. tank crew fighting their way through the final days of World War II is the cinematic equivalent of getting caught in a bear hug from a tank unexpectedly brutal, but oddly heartfelt once you’re able to breathe again.
Brad Pitt plays Don “Wardaddy” Collier, a battle-hardened tank commander with more scars and gravelly wisdom than a character in an old western. His tank crew is a motley bunch, including Shia LaBeouf as the Bible-quoting, scarred veteran, and Logan Lerman as the fresh-faced recruit who probably thought joining the army was going to be more "go to war" and less "try not to die in a giant metal box." The chemistry between the crew is palpable these guys have been through hell and are bonding over shared trauma, gunpowder, and, for some reason, an alarming amount of raw meat.
The tank, Fury itself, is as much of a character as any of the actors. It’s big, it’s loud, and it’s essentially a rolling fortress of destruction that seems to have a mind of its own. The crew spends most of the movie inside this claustrophobic metal beast, navigating the chaos of war while fighting the very real fear that a single bullet could turn them all into shrapnel. It’s kind of like a really dangerous game of sardines, except with more explosions and less room to breathe.
Brad Pitt’s performance as Wardaddy is surprisingly nuanced. Yes, he’s the tough-as-nails leader, barking orders like he’s auditioning for the role of “Grizzled War Vet of the Year,” but there’s a vulnerability beneath all that swagger. Watching him try to protect his crew while managing his own trauma feels like watching a dad trying to keep his kids alive during a family camping trip gone terribly wrong. Except, in this case, the “camping trip” is a battlefield and the “kids” are all covered in dirt and grime.
Shia LaBeouf’s character, Bible, is one of the highlights of the film. He’s the kind of guy who will quote scripture one moment and stab a Nazi the next. It’s like he read the entire Bible during boot camp, and now he’s determined to live every passage, whether it’s relevant to the situation or not. He’s the tank crew’s moral compass, except his compass is a little more twisted from the horrors of war. His performance is unexpectedly tender, and honestly, it makes you think, “Wait… I might actually like Shia LaBeouf now?”
But the real surprise here is Logan Lerman, who plays Norman, the greenhorn with absolutely no business being in a tank. He’s like the guy who shows up to a BBQ with a salad and then gets handed a BBQ skewer and told to “make it happen.” Lerman does an incredible job of making Norman relatable, he’s not a hero, he’s just a guy trying to survive and hold onto whatever scraps of humanity he can while being buried in a nightmare. The film’s emotional core is really about his journey from terrified newbie to hardened soldier and it’s surprisingly moving.
The battle sequences are intense, realistic, and chaotic, which is a nice way of saying you will probably jump in your seat at least once. The movie doesn’t spare you the brutality of war; it’s loud, it’s messy, and it feels like you’re right there in the tank with the crew, trying not to vomit from the stress. The cinematography does a great job of conveying the claustrophobia of life inside the tank, and the sound design is so good that you’ll feel like you’ve been inside a metal box while war rages around you.
However, Fury isn’t perfect. The plot can be predictable at times, and some of the more “heroic” moments feel a little too heavy on the “tough guy” tropes. But to be fair, when a movie involves a group of men fighting Nazis in a tank, there’s only so much subtlety you can expect. It’s like a roller coaster: fast, furious, and thrilling, but don’t expect too much introspection between loop-de-loops.
Would I recommend Fury? Absolutely. It’s a gritty, action-packed war movie with enough emotional depth to make you think a little harder about the toll of war (and maybe reconsider eating all your meals with your tank crew). It’s not a movie you’ll watch for fun, but it’s definitely one you’ll remember long after the credits roll.
Pro tip: Don’t watch this movie if you’re claustrophobic, don’t like loud noises, or have a soft spot for raw meat. Otherwise, buckle up it’s going to be a wild, tank-filled ride.
Review: Black Hawk Down – A Rollercoaster of Explosions, Heroism, and Very Bad Decisions
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
If you’re looking for a movie that combines military bravado, intense action, and a stunning lack of common sense (as in, “Why would anyone do this?”), Black Hawk Down is your ticket. Directed by Ridley Scott and released in 2001, this film is based on the true story of the 1993 Battle of Mogadishu, where a group of American soldiers found themselves in a situation so messy, you’d think it was organised by someone who thought, “How about a military operation that involves lots of bullets, no backup, and a completely avoidable helicopter crash?” Spoiler alert: they’re all trying to survive the consequences of that very bad decision.
The plot of Black Hawk Down is relatively simple, but it doesn’t really need to be. A group of elite American soldiers is sent to Somalia on a mission to capture a warlord’s henchmen. This should be easy enough, right? Well, of course not. The mission goes sideways in a hurry planes crash, helicopters get shot down, and suddenly, everyone’s in a life-or-death situation in a hostile urban jungle where nobody knows the lay of the land. What follows is a chaotic, action-packed series of events that could best be described as “the world’s worst field trip” (only this one has bullets instead of sandwiches).
Now, let’s talk about the cast because if you’ve ever wanted to see a bunch of actors go from zero to military hero in 60 seconds, this is the movie for you. You've got Josh Hartnett as the not-quite-heroic but somehow still likable Sergeant Eversmann, Ewan McGregor doing his best “I’m just a regular guy in a life-or-death situation” routine, and Tom Hardy (before he was Tom Hardy) as a soldier who really, really wishes he hadn’t signed up for this mission. There’s a lot of macho posturing, but it’s quickly overshadowed by the sheer volume of bullets flying around and people shouting things like, “We’re going down!” or “I need backup!” in the most dramatic ways possible.
The real MVP of Black Hawk Down, however, is the action. This film does not hold back. Ridley Scott puts you in the middle of the action, and it's a lot of action like, “Did I just hear another explosion? Yep, that’s another helicopter blowing up!” You’ll spend 90% of the movie thinking, “Oh my God, are they ever going to stop shooting?” But the answer is no. There’s no stop button for war, apparently. If you’re looking for subtlety and long-winded monologues about the human condition, Black Hawk Down is probably not your cup of tea. But if you want to watch a series of tightly choreographed, bullet-riddled, adrenaline-pumping action sequences, you’re in for a ride.
The cinematography here is also noteworthy. The film captures the intense chaos of the battle with shaky camera work that somehow makes you feel like you’re also about to get hit by a stray bullet. It’s like you’re right there with the soldiers, wondering why you ever thought it was a good idea to pick up a gun and enter a country you can’t pronounce. It’s gritty, immersive, and makes you really feel the madness of war not in an intellectual, political way, but more in a “I can’t breathe and my heart rate just doubled” kind of way. The film’s pacing is relentless; there’s almost no time to stop and ask yourself, “Is this the right strategy?” It’s more like, “Am I going to make it out alive?”
But it’s not all action, though. Black Hawk Down does take a moment now and then to remind you that, amidst all the chaos, these soldiers are real people with families, hopes, and dreams. Just kidding. It’s mostly about the explosions. But hey, occasionally you get a quiet moment where someone says something profound like, “We’re here for each other,” and then, BOOM, a helicopter explodes. Oh, the irony.
Now, if you’re looking for the kind of war movie that explores deep moral dilemmas and the futility of conflict, you’ll be disappointed. Black Hawk Down isn’t trying to make a statement, it’s trying to show you how insanely difficult it is to survive when everything goes wrong. It’s intense in a way that feels more like watching a well-executed demolition derby than a thoughtful war film. The film has no agenda other than to show the chaos, confusion, and bravery of soldiers in combat. It’s a gloriously unpretentious popcorn flick, but just with a lot more blood and bullets.
Would I recommend Black Hawk Down? Sure! But only if you’re in the mood for an action-packed thrill ride where the plot is simple, the stakes are high, and the explosions are louder than the dialogue. It’s the perfect movie if you’ve ever wanted to see how bad a mission can go when you think you’re on a routine operation that turns into a two-hour firefight. Expect to be on the edge of your seat, yelling at the screen, and wondering why the heck these soldiers don’t have a better exit strategy.
Pro tip: Watch this with someone who’s equally into high-stakes action and who won’t be asking questions like, “Why is this happening?” during the second firefight. That’s not the time for questions. It’s the time for holding your breath and hoping these poor guys make it out alive, although they probably won’t. Spoiler alert: a lot of people don’t make it.
Review: The Wind That Shakes the Barley – Freedom, Tragedy, and Really Intense Irish Accents
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Watching The Wind That Shakes the Barley feels like being handed a pint of Guinness and a history lesson, only to realise halfway through that the lesson is about why everything hurts, including your heart. Directed by Ken Loach, this 2006 drama dives into the Irish War of Independence and the Irish Civil War with the emotional heft of a film determined to make you care and cry.
Cillian Murphy stars as Damien, a young doctor who gives up his career to join the Irish Republican Army after witnessing the brutality of British forces. Murphy brings his trademark intensity, staring into the middle distance as though the weight of Ireland’s history is resting entirely on his cheekbones. He’s joined by Pádraic Delaney as his brother Teddy, and together they navigate the messy, heartbreaking realities of revolution and the even messier heartbreak of what happens after the revolution. Spoiler: it’s not great.
The film’s strength lies in its unflinching realism. Ken Loach doesn’t romanticise war or revolution, this isn’t Braveheart with its rousing speeches and slow-motion charges. Instead, it’s a gritty, grounded exploration of what happens when ordinary people are thrust into extraordinary circumstances. The battles aren’t grand; they’re messy, chaotic ambushes where the stakes feel crushingly personal. Every gunshot and shout echoes with the weight of history, which might explain why The Wind That Shakes the Barley won the Palme d’Or at Cannes.
But don’t expect much levity. This is a film that trades humour for heartbreak at every turn. It’s not so much about winning independence as it is about the cost of trying, and the way it fractures communities, families, and yes, even brothers. The tension between Damien and Teddy grows as they find themselves on opposite sides of the Civil War, culminating in scenes so gut-wrenching you’ll want to shout, “Can we not with the family drama right now?!”
That said, the movie isn’t without its unintentionally funny moments, mostly courtesy of its dialogue. The thick Irish accents are so intense that unless you were born in County Cork, you’ll probably spend the first 20 minutes wondering if you accidentally turned on the Gaelic version. Subtitles are highly recommended, unless you want to miss key lines and just nod along like you understand what’s happening.
The cinematography is stunning, capturing the lush, rolling hills of Ireland in a way that makes you want to book a flight until you remember those hills are crawling with ambushes and tragic betrayals. The natural beauty of the setting provides a stark contrast to the violence and heartbreak unfolding on screen, making the film as visually captivating as it is emotionally devastating.
If there’s a flaw, it’s that The Wind That Shakes the Barley can feel a bit heavy-handed at times. The British soldiers are almost cartoonishly cruel, which, while historically accurate in some cases, makes them feel less like characters and more like walking symbols of oppression. And while the film’s deliberate pace allows for emotional depth, there are moments where you might catch yourself thinking, “Okay, we get it war is bad.”
Would I recommend it? Absolutely, if you’re in the mood for a history lesson wrapped in raw emotion and gorgeous Irish landscapes. Just don’t expect an easy watch. The Wind That Shakes the Barley is a film that grabs you by the heartstrings, gives them a good yank, and then leaves you sitting in stunned silence, questioning everything you thought you knew about war, independence, and brotherhood.
Pro tip: Have tissues on hand and maybe a stiff drink. You’ll need both.
Review: Doctor Zhivago – Love, Revolution, and the World’s Most Beautiful Snowstorm
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
If you’ve ever wondered what happens when you mix Russian literature, epic romance, and a plotline so sweeping it could cover an entire continent, then Doctor Zhivago is the film for you. Directed by David Lean and based on Boris Pasternak’s novel, this 1965 epic drama is basically the cinematic equivalent of sitting through an emotionally intense winter storm, beautiful, heart-wrenching, and occasionally difficult to navigate without a box of tissues and maybe a blanket.
The film stars Omar Sharif as Yuri Zhivago, a man who does everything he can to avoid the dramatic chaos of the Russian Revolution while somehow becoming entangled in every form of emotional turmoil possible. The guy’s just trying to live his life, but life keeps throwing him love triangles, political upheaval, and literal snowstorms in his path. Meanwhile, Julie Christie plays Lara, the woman of his dreams (and nightmares), who has about as much luck with timing as you’d expect from someone caught between two revolutions and three men.
The central love story is the sort that makes you both swoon and shout at the screen, “Just pick a side, Yuri!” Seriously, if there was an Olympic event for indecisiveness, Zhivago would win gold. He’s like, "Should I stay with my wife, Tonya, or should I embrace this torrid love affair with Lara, who is also embroiled in a deadly love triangle?" And while you get that the whole “Russian Revolution” thing is a bit distracting, it’s still hilarious watching a man who could use a little more backbone in the relationship department. But hey, it’s Omar Sharif, so we forgive him.
The real winner here is the production design. Doctor Zhivago is a visual feast—epic landscapes, stunning Russian countryside, and sweeping shots of snowflakes falling like confetti at a New Year’s Eve party. Every frame is a painting, and the cinematography by Freddie Young is so gorgeous, it’s hard to decide whether you’re watching a historical war drama or a travel advertisement for Russia. And then there’s the snow, this movie has enough snow to make you wonder if the entire budget went to hiring snow machines. When it’s not falling on people dramatically in love, it’s covering their faces with existential despair. Snow, it turns out, is the film’s true star.
The cast, beyond Sharif and Christie, delivers impressive performances too. Rod Steiger plays the passionate and slightly unhinged Viktor Komarovsky, Lara’s older lover, and let me tell you, this guy is like the Russian version of a clingy ex. He has all the charm of a hurricane and none of the self-awareness. The rest of the supporting cast is solid as well, though at times you might feel like you’re getting whiplash from all the shifting political allegiances and fluctuating emotions.
But let’s be real: Doctor Zhivago is long. Like, really long. At over three hours, the pacing can feel like you’re trudging through Russian snow with an existential crisis at every turn. There are moments where you’ll be wondering if they’ve reached a plot point or if it’s just more snow falling. The film goes through decades of history, political revolutions, love affairs, and Russian winters, which at times can feel a little bit like reading War and Peace… but with more snow and fewer battles.
The soundtrack, composed by Maurice Jarre, is iconic. The theme is so beautiful, it might as well be a character in the film. It’s hauntingly romantic, and it will stick with you long after the film ends. Honestly, the theme plays so much, you might find yourself humming it while shopping for groceries. You’re welcome in advance for the earworm.
Would I recommend Doctor Zhivago? Yes, but with a couple of caveats. If you’re in the mood for an epic saga about love, war, revolution, and snow, lots of snow, then it’s worth every minute. Just be prepared for the long haul and make sure you’ve got a cosy blanket nearby. It’s an emotional rollercoaster, and you might need a break halfway through to process all the feelings (and snow).
Review: "A Bridge Too Far" - Where War Meets Star-Studded Chaos
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Watching A Bridge Too Far feels like attending the most ambitious potluck dinner ever, everyone’s brought something great, but nobody coordinated, and now you’re drowning in mashed potatoes with no main dish in sight.
This 1977 war epic, directed by Richard Attenborough, attempts to tell the true story of Operation Market Garden, the Allied effort to secure a series of bridges in the Netherlands during World War II. Spoiler alert: things don’t go as planned. In fact, if the title didn’t already clue you in, A Bridge Too Far is about one bridge too many and one plan too optimistic.
First, the cast. Oh boy, the cast. This movie isn’t just star-studded; it’s star-saturated. Sean Connery, Michael Caine, Robert Redford, Anthony Hopkins, James Caan, basically, if you were a leading man in the ’70s and weren’t in this movie, you were probably on vacation. The sheer number of famous faces borders on absurdity. At one point, you half expect a young Harrison Ford to pop out from under a bridge and say, "Need a hand?" It’s like The Avengers, but with more helmets and less CGI.
With such an ensemble, the movie does a decent job juggling its many subplots. One minute you’re with Anthony Hopkins trying to cross a bridge under heavy fire; the next, you’re with Robert Redford rowing his way into certain doom with a look that says, “I really should’ve stuck to The Sting.” It’s a lot to keep track of, but hey, so was the actual operation, so maybe that’s part of the charm.
The action sequences are where A Bridge Too Far really shines. The film’s dedication to practical effects and large-scale battles is impressive. Tanks roll, planes drop paratroopers, and bridges explode with the kind of old-school authenticity that makes modern CGI-heavy war movies feel like video games. You can practically smell the gunpowder and hear the groans of the production crew moving all that equipment.
But for all its spectacle, the film has its flaws, namely, pacing. At nearly three hours long, it’s a marathon of miscommunication, bad luck, and military hubris. The first half builds tension nicely, but by the time the operation falls apart, you might find yourself glancing at your watch and thinking, "Okay, we get it the plan was bad."
And let’s talk about the tone. Despite the grim subject matter, the film has moments that border on unintentionally funny. For example, James Caan’s character refuses to let a wounded soldier die simply because, well, he doesn’t feel like it. He literally threatens a doctor at gunpoint to keep the guy alive, which is equal parts heroic and “wait, what?” moments like these make you wonder if the movie knows it’s teetering on the edge of melodrama.
Still, A Bridge Too Far succeeds where it counts: showing the chaos, complexity, and human cost of war. It’s a cautionary tale about the dangers of overreach, both in battle and in casting directors trying to fit too many A-listers into one film.
Would I recommend it? Absolutely, for fans of war movies, history buffs, or anyone who wants to see Sean Connery in a military beret looking like he’s about to charm his way out of an ambush. Just make sure you have snacks and a comfy chair, you’re in for the long haul.
No comments:
Post a Comment